This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David C. Martin, MD; Judson Miller; Wishwa Kapoor, MD; Michael Karpf, MD; François Boller, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(1):77-80.

Abstract
• The role of computed tomography (CT) of the head in evaluating patients with dementing illnesses remains a controversial issue. Several prediction rules to guide the selective application of CT in the evaluation of dementia have recently been proposed in the medical literature. The present authors examine the value of four such rules through a validation study performed in an outpatient geriatric assessment unit. The rules were assessed in terms of their diagnostic sensitivities, specificities, misclassification rates, and information contents. Prediction rule sensitivities ranged from 12.5% to 87.5%, specificities from 37.2% to 77.9%, and misclassification rates from 23.5% to 60.8%. Of the four prediction rules examined, one emerged as significantly more sensitive than the others, and also served to reduce diagnostic uncertainty a full order of magnitude more than the others, as determined by an information content analysis. Disadvantages to this rule, however, were found in its more complex nature and the assessment of a very high rate of misclassification. Through a critique of existing strategies, this study purports to determine the potential for establishing a useful clinical prediction rule to guide selective CT scanning in the diagnostic evaluation of dementia.

(Arch Intern Med 1987;147:77-80)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Martin, Kapoor, Karpf, and Mr Miller); Psychiatry (Drs Martin and Boller), and Neurology (Dr Boller), University of Pittsburgh.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 21, 1986.

Presented in part at the Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine annual meeting, May 2-3, 1985, Washington, DC.

Reprint requests to Benedum Geriatric Center, 110 Lothrop Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (Dr Martin).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The value of cranial computed tomography in old age psychiatry: a review of the results of 178 consecutive scans
Fielding
The Psychiatrist 2005;29:21-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Decreasing Prevalence of Reversible Dementias: An Updated Meta-analysis
Clarfield
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2219-2229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Essentials of the Proper Diagnoses of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Major Subtypes of Dementia
Knopman et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:1290-1308.
ABSTRACT  

Quality Indicators for Dementia in Vulnerable Community-Dwelling and Hospitalized Elders
Chow and MacLean
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:668-676.
FULL TEXT  

Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Knopman et al.
Neurology 2001;56:1143-1153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules for Neuroimaging in the Evaluation of Dementia
Gifford et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2855-2862.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Computed Tomographic Brain Imaging Have a Place in the Diagnosis of Dementia?
Engel and Gelber
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1437-1440.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Dementia and Investigating Its Causes
Siu
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:122-132.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia
Gittelman
ANN INTERN MED 1989;110:669-670.
ABSTRACT  

The Reversible Dementias: Do They Reverse?
Clarfield
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:476-486.
ABSTRACT