You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 10, October 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Knowledge Base of Certified Internists

Relationships to Training, Practice Type, and Other Physician Characteristics

Jan D. Carline, PhD; Thomas S. Inui, ScM, MD; Eric B. Larson, MD, MPH; James P. LoGerfo, MD, MPH; Paul G. Ramsey, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(10):2311-2313.


Abstract

• A written examination was used to assess the knowledge base of 183 practicing certified internists. Analyses of the examination scores showed that performance on the initial American Board of Internal Medicine certification examination taken 7.6 years previously was the major factor predicting current knowledge base. By developing regression models, the unique contribution of different variables to prediction of current examination scores was determined. Prior American Board of Internal Medicine certification examination performance accounted for 70.9% of the explained variance, and demographic and practice variables were responsible for 17.8%. Among the demographic and practice variables studied, community size and subspecialty practice were the only variables that contributed significantly to the regression equations. Examination scores were highest for certified internists practicing in smaller communities. General internists received higher scores than subspecialists. Although statistically significant, the apparent adverse influence of subspecialty practice and larger community size on examination performance was modest. Further study is needed to determine if longer periods in practice might produce different relationships between variables such as these and examination performance.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2311-2313)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine and the Division of Research in Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 7,1989.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the American Board of Internal Medicine or the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Palo Alto, Calif.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine RG-20, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Ramsey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses
Donohoe
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1596-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes Over Time in the Knowledge Base of Practicing Internists
Ramsey et al.
JAMA 1991;266:1103-1107.
ABSTRACT  

Internal Medicine: A View from the Country
Loge
ANN INTERN MED 1991;114:92-93.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.