You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 11, 9 JUNE 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Place of Renal Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis

Fifteen Years of Clinical Experience

Brigit C. van Jaarsveld, MD; Pieta Krijnen, MSc; Frans H. M. Derkx, MD, PhD; H. Yoe Oei, MD, PhD; Cornelis T. Postma, MD, PhD; Maarten A. D. H. Schalekamp, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(11):1226-1234.


Abstract

Background
Renal scintigraphy with radiolabeled pentetic acid (diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid [DTPA]) or, more recently, mertiatide (mercaptoacetyltriglycine [MAG3] ), with or without captopril challenge, is widely recommended as a diagnostic test for renal artery stenosis.

Objectives
To address (1) whether the diagnostic accuracy has been improved by the use of captopril and the introduction of mertiatide and (2) whether a renal scan that shows abnormalities is a useful criterion to select patients for renal arteriography.

Patients and Methods
A standard diagnostic protocol, using both scintigraphy and arteriography, was followed in 505 consecutive high-risk hypertensive patients who were evaluated for renovascular hypertension at the University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, from 1978 to 1992.

Results
Renal artery stenosis (≥50%) was present in 263 patients. When the single-kidney fractional uptake was used as a diagnostic criterion, a specificity of 0.90 was obtained at a cutoff value of 35% for the worst kidney in scintigraphy using pentetic acid without captopril challenge (n=225) and at a cutoff value of 37% after captopril challenge (n=280). This was associated with sensitivity levels of 0.65 and 0.68, respectively. The difference between the uptake of pentetic acid with and without captopril challenge in the 85 patients who were studied under both circumstances was no more accurate as a predictor of renal artery stenosis. In the 93 patients who were studied with mertiatide as well as with pentetic acid, both after captopril challenge, the diagnostic accuracy was no better with mertiatide than with pentetic acid; mertiatide failed to offer any advantage not only when the single-kidney fractional uptake was used as a criterion, but also with the use of other scintigraphic parameters (eg, time to peak, time to pyelum, overall shape of renographic curve, and kidney size).

Conclusions
The diagnostic accuracy of renal scintigraphy has not been improved by the introduction of mertiatide or by the use of captopril. The usefulness of scintigraphy as a diagnostic test for the presence of renal artery stenosis remains questionable. The physician will always confront either a substantial number of arteriograms that do not show abnormalities when renal scintigraphy is omitted as a screening step or a substantial number of missed diagnoses when a renal scan that shows abnormalities is used as a prerequisite for arteriography.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1226-1234



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Internal Medicine I (Drs van Jaarsveld, Derkx, and Schalekamp), Clinical Decision Analysis (Ms Krijnen), and Nuclear Medicine (Dr Oei), University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Nijmegen (Dr Postma), the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Doppler sonography in renal artery stenosis--does the Resistive Index predict the success of intervention?
Krumme and Hollenbeck
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:692-696.
FULL TEXT  

Increased Renal Arterial Resistance Predicts the Course of Renal Function in Type 2 Diabetes With Microalbuminuria
Nosadini et al.
Diabetes 2006;55:234-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fibromuscular Dysplasia
Slovut and Olin
NEJM 2004;350:1862-1871.
FULL TEXT  

Asymmetry of Renal Blood Flow in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hypertension
van Onna et al.
Hypertension 2003;41:108-113.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utility of Captopril Renal Scans for Detecting Renal Artery Stenosis
Huot et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1981-1984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Renal Artery Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of Captopril-Enhanced Doppler Sonography, Captopril-Enhanced Scintigraphy, and MR Angiography
Qanadli et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:1123-1129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Captopril MR Renography in a Swine Model: Toward a Comprehensive Evaluation of Renal Arterial Stenosis
Prasad et al.
Radiology 2000;217:813-818.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Balloon Angioplasty on Hypertension in Atherosclerotic Renal-Artery Stenosis
van Jaarsveld et al.
NEJM 2000;342:1007-1014.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Perspectives on the Role of Captopril Imaging in the Diagnosis of Renovascular Disease
Collins and Gusberg
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2000;13:43-69.
ABSTRACT  

A Clinical Prediction Rule for Renal Artery Stenosis
Krijnen et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1998;129:705-711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.