You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 18, October 13, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Echocardiography
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Optimizing Long-term Cardiac Management After Major Vascular Surgery

Role of {beta}-Blocker Therapy, Clinical Characteristics, and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography to Optimize Long-term Cardiac Management After Major Vascular Surgery

Miklos D. Kertai, MD, DSc; Eric Boersma, PhD; Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD; Ian R. Thomson, MD; Maarten J. Cramer, MD; Louis L. M. van de Ven, MD, PhD; Michaël G. Scheffer, MD; Giuseppe Trocino, MD; Carlo Vigna, MD; Hubert F. Baars, MD; Hero van Urk, PhD; Jos R. T. C. Roelandt, MD, PhD; Don Poldermans, MD; for the Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography (DECREASE) Study Group

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2230-2235.

Background  Survivors of major vascular surgery are at increased risk of late cardiac complications.

Objective  To examine the cardioprotective effect of {beta}-blockers.

Methods  A follow-up study was conducted in 1286 patients who survived surgery for at least 30 days. Patients were screened for cardiac risk factors and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) results; 1034 patients (80%) underwent preoperative DSE, and 370 (29%) received {beta}-blockers. The main outcome measure was late cardiac death or myocardial infarction.

Results  Seventy-four patients (5.8%) had late cardiac events. Cardiac event rates in patients with 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more risk factors were 1.6%, 4.7%, and 19.2%, respectively. In patients without risk factors, {beta}-blockers were associated with improved event-free survival (2.8% vs 0%), and DSE had no additional prognostic value. In patients with 1 to 2 risk factors, the presence of ischemia during DSE increased cardiac events from 3.9% to 9.8%. However, if patients with ischemia were treated with {beta}-blockers, the risk decreased to 7.2%. In patients with 3 or more risk factors, DSE and {beta}-blockers stratified patients into intermediate- and high-risk groups. In patients without ischemia, {beta}-blockers reduced the cardiac event rate from 15.1% to 9.5%, whereas the cardioprotective effect was limited in patients with 3 or more risk factors and positive DSE findings.

Conclusions  Long-term {beta}-blocker use is associated with a reduction in the cardiac event rate, except for patients with 3 or more risk factors and positive findings on DSE.


From the Departments of Cardiology (Drs Kertai, Boersma, Bax, van de Ven, and Roelandt) and Vascular Surgery (Drs van Urk and Poldermans), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Dr Thomson); Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dr Cramer); Sint Clara Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam (Dr Scheffer); Department of Cardiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy (Dr Trocino); Department of Cardiology, Instituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (Dr Vigna); and Department of Cardiology, Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands (Dr Baars).
A complete listing of the DECREASE Study Group members was published previously (N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1789-1794).
The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery
Fleisher et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e159-e242.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Fleisher et al.
Circulation 2007;116:e418-e500.
FULL TEXT  

Two-Year Outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Blankensteijn et al.
NEJM 2005;352:2398-2405.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.