You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 17, September 25, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Adverse Psychological and Coronary Risk Profiles in Young Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Benefits of Formal Cardiac Rehabilitation

Carl J. Lavie, MD; Richard V. Milani, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1878-1883.

Background  Recent data indicate that young patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have a poor long-term prognosis. Although the benefits of formal cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs are well established, most of these data come from middle-aged and older patients.

Methods  We assessed baseline behavioral data, quality of life, and risk profiles in 635 consecutive patients with CAD before and after cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training, and specifically assessed data in 104 young patients (mean ± SD age, 48 ± 6 years; range, 22-54 years) compared with 260 elderly patients (mean ± SD age, 75 ± 3 years; range, 70-85 years).

Results  Compared with older patients, young patients had higher body mass indexes (12.2%, P<.001), total cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein ratio (14.6%, P<.01), and triglycerides level (27.2%, P<.01), and a lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (–8.8%, P=.045). Young patients also had higher scores for anxiety and hostility (51.5% and 94.4%, respectively; P<.001 for both), a considerably higher prevalence of anxiety (27.9% vs 13.5%; P<.01) and hostility (12.5% vs 4.6%; P<.01) symptoms, and slightly more depression symptoms (23.1% vs 18.8%) compared with elderly patients. Following cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training, young patients had improvements in body mass index (–1.7%, P<.01), percentage body fat (–4.4%, P<.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (10.2%, P<.001), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (–33.3%, P<.01), peak oxygen consumption (11.3%, P<.001), resting heart rate (–4.5%, P=.01), and resting systolic pressure (–2.3%, P=.049), and marked improvements in scores for depression (–58.5%), anxiety (–46.0%), hostility (–45.7%), somatization (–33.8%), and quality of life (15.8%) (P<.001 for all). Young patients also had greater than 50% to greater than 80% reductions in the prevalence of anxiety (P<.001), hostility (P<.01), and depression (P<.001).

Conclusion  These data demonstrate the adverse psychological and CAD risk profiles that are present in young patients with CAD following major CAD events, and are consistent with substantial benefit of formal cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs in younger adults.


Author Affiliations: Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, La.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Self-estimated physical functioning poorly predicts actual exercise capacity in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease
Gratz et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;0:ehn531v1-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation
Wenger
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1619-1631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The role of exercise training in peripheral arterial disease
Milani and Lavie
Vasc Med 2007;12:351-358.
ABSTRACT  

Stopping Stress at Its Origins
Milani and Lavie
Hypertension 2007;49:268-269.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.