You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 21, November 27, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Highly Trained Staff in an Emergency Department Setting

Heidrun Losert, MD; Fritz Sterz, MD; Klemens Köhler, MD; Gottfried Sodeck, MD; Roman Fleischhackl, MD; Philip Eisenburger, MD; Andreas Kliegel, MD; Harald Herkner, MD; Helge Myklebust, BEng; Jon Nysæther, PhD; Anton N. Laggner, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2375-2380.

Background  Recent reports have highlighted the poor standard of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) achieved by health care professionals in diverse situations. We explored what can be achieved in an emergency department by highly trained permanent staff.

Methods  In a prospective observational study conducted from June 1, 2002, to August 31, 2005, 80 of 213 patients requiring CPR and admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital were eligible for study participation. Owing to several logistic problems with CPR, 133 patients could not be studied. The CPR team consisted of emergency- and critical care–trained physicians with more than 10 years of acute care experience, most of whom were instructors of European Resuscitation Council courses in basic and advanced life support. A specially designed defibrillator was used to assess the quality of CPR.

Results  For 80 patients, 95 data sets were available for analysis, yielding a total of 1065 minutes of cardiac arrest time. Chest compressions were performed at a rate of 114 (95% confidence interval [CI], 112-116) per minute, resulting in a mean of 96 (95% CI, 93-99) delivered chest compressions per minute. We further observed a mean hands-off ratio of 12.7% (95% CI, 12.3%-13.1%), and the hands-off ratio was linearly associated with the duration of CPR (R2 = 0.95; mean, 4.3% increments per 5-10 minutes; P<.001). Patients were hyperventilated with a median of 18 (interquartile range, 14-24) ventilations per minute.

Conclusions  Highly trained professionals in an emergency department can achieve appropriate chest compression rates during CPR with a low hands-off ratio. Increased attention must be paid in all situations to the avoidance of hyperventilation.


Author Affiliations: Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Drs Losert, Sterz, Köhler, Sodeck, Fleischhackl, Eisenburger, Kliegel, Herkner, and Laggner); and Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway (Mr Myklebust and Dr Nysæther).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation may not be futile
Eisenburger et al.
Br J Anaesth 2008;101:518-522.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does pre-hospital ventilation effect outcome after significant brain injury?
Warner and Bulger
Trauma 2007;9:283-289.
ABSTRACT  

CPR: How Good Is Good?
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.