You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 2, January 28, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Variations Between Clinical Trial Participants and Medicare Beneficiaries in Evidence Used for Medicare National Coverage Decisions

Sanket S. Dhruva, BA; Rita F. Redberg, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):136-140.

Background  There is a paucity of data on the adequacy of the resources and tools used by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) in making national coverage determinations about services for beneficiaries. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which clinical trials relied on by the CMS are applicable to Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods  We performed a meta-analysis of data on 40 009 individuals from all 141 trials included in the technology assessments for the 6 cardiovascular disease meetings of the CMS advisory panel and compared them with the demographics of the Medicare population.

Results  Medicare beneficiaries differ significantly from the cardiovascular clinical trial participants used to inform Medicare coverage decisions. Clinical trial participants, compared with beneficiaries, are more likely to be younger (60.1 vs 74.7 years), male (75.4% vs 41.8%), and non-US residents (60% vs 0%). The clinical trials, moreover, rarely included outcome stratification by age, sex, and race.

Conclusions  Participants in cardiovascular studies relied on by the CMS for coverage determinations differ substantially from the Medicare population. Data frequently are not available on relevant subgroup populations. Suggestions are made that address the need for data more relevant to Medicare beneficiaries by increasing enrollment of, and reporting on, women and elderly individuals in clinical trials and use of relevant data for coverage decisions.


Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Women's Cardiovascular Services (Dr Redberg), University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine (Mr Dhruva).


RELATED ARTICLE

Generalizability of the Results of Randomized Trials
Noel S. Weiss, Thomas D. Koepsell, and Bruce M. Psaty
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):133-135.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk for Death Associated with Medications for Recently Diagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Lee et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:380-390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? No
Landefeld et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1277-1277.
FULL TEXT  

Generalizability of the Results of Randomized Trials
Weiss et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:133-135.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.