You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 16, September 14, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Internet
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Randomized Controlled Trial of Proactive Web-Based Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for University Students

Kypros Kypri, PhD; Jonathan Hallett, BA; Peter Howat, PhD; Alexandra McManus, PhD; Bruce Maycock, PhD; Steven Bowe, MMedStat; Nicholas J. Horton, ScD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(16):1508-1514.

Background  University students drink more heavily than their nonstudent peers and are often unaware that their drinking is risky and exceeds normative levels. We tested the efficacy of a proactive Web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention program.

Methods  A randomized controlled trial was conducted at an Australian university in 2007. Invitations were sent to 13 000 undergraduates (age range, 17-24 years) to complete a Web-based Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Of 7237 students who responded, 2435 scored in the hazardous/harmful range (≥8) and were randomized, and 2050 (84%) completed at least 1 follow-up assessment. Intervention was 10 minutes of Web-based motivational assessment and personalized feedback. Controls received only screening. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1 and 6 months with observers and participants blinded to allocation. Outcome measures were drinking frequency, typical occasion quantity, overall volume, number of personal problems, an academic problems score, prevalence of binge drinking, and prevalence of heavy drinking.

Results  Mean (SD) baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores for control and intervention groups were 14.3 (5.1) and 14.2 (5.1), respectively. After 1 month, participants receiving intervention drank less often (rate ratio [RR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94), smaller quantities per occasion (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98), and less alcohol overall (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90) than did controls. Differences in alcohol-related harms were nonsignificant. At 6 months, intervention effects persisted for drinking frequency (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97) and overall volume (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96) but not for other variables.

Conclusion  Proactive Web-based screening and intervention reduces drinking in undergraduates, and such a program could be implemented widely.

Trial Registration  anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12608000104358


Author Affiliations: School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia (Dr Kypri and Mr Bowe); Injury Prevention Research Unit, University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand (Dr Kypri); Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute (Mr Hallett and Drs Howat, McManus, and Maycock) and Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer Control (Mr Hallett and Drs Howat, McManus, and Maycock), Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia; and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Horton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(16):1459.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.