You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 20, November 9, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Battling Quackery

Attitudes About Micronutrient Supplements in American Academic Medicine

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2187-2191.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

THROUGHOUT THE 20th century American academic medicine has resisted the concept that supplementation with micronutrients might have health benefits. This resistance is evident in several ways: (1) by the uncritical acceptance of news of toxicity, such as the belief that vitamin C supplements cause kidney stones; (2) by the angry, scornful tone used in discussions of micronutrient supplementation in the leading textbooks of medicine; and (3) by ignoring evidence for possible efficacy of a micronutrient supplement, such as the use of vitamin E for intermittent claudication.

Part of the resistance stems from the fact that the potential benefits of micronutrients were advanced by outsiders, who took their message directly to the public, and part from the fact that the concept of a deficiency disease did not fit in well with prevailing biomedical paradigms, particularly the germ theory. Similar factors might be expected to color the response of academic medicine to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

UNCRITICAL ACCEPTANCE OF NEWS OF TOXICITY: THE EXAMPLE OF HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN C

SCORNFUL, DISMISSIVE TONE: THE EXAMPLE OF DAILY MULTIPLE VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTATION

IGNORING CLAIMS OF EFFICACY: THE EXAMPLE OF VITAMIN E FOR INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION

WHY THE RESISTANCE?

CONCLUSIONS



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vitamin C Deficiency in a University Teaching Hospital
Gan et al.
J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2008;27:428-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing nutritional quality
Heaney and Rafferty
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006;83:722-723.
FULL TEXT  

Nutrition and Chronic Disease
Heaney
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:297-299.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Natural Product Use Between Primary Care and Nephrology Patients
Grabe and Garrison
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:1169-1172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vitamin D, Nutritional Deficiency, and the Medical Paradigm
Heaney
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;88:5107-5108.
FULL TEXT  

Author's Response to Commentaries
Goodwin
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2003;58:M669-670.
FULL TEXT  

Dietary Supplement Use: Consumer Characteristics and Interests
Greger
J. Nutr. 2001;131:1339S-1343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Holistic Pediatrics: A Research Agenda
Kemper et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:902-909.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Conventional" and "Unconventional" Medicine: Can They Be Integrated?
Dalen
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:2179-2181.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.