You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 19, October 26, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Renal Diseases, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
ALLHAT Findings Revisited in the Context of Subsequent Analyses, Other Trials, and Meta-analyses

Macaulay A. C. Onuigbo, MD, MSc, FWACP, FASN

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I read with interest and curiosity the recent revisitation of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) trial by Wright et al.1 They concluded that current evidence confirmed that neither {alpha}-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), nor calcium channel blockers (CCBs), surpass thiazide-type diuretics (at an appropriate dosage) as initial therapy for reduction of cardiovascular or renal risk.1 We cannot agree more, especially in light of recent trials including the ONTARGET trial2 and new insights into plausible benefits of cardioprotection and renoprotection using different antihypertensive classes.3-4

We were surprised that the ALLHAT revisitation did not go further than just this statement1(p834):

Thus, compared with diuretic-based treatment, CCB- and ACE-inhibitor based therapies failed to demonstrate superiority in the prevention of CVD [cardiovascular disease] or ESRD [end-stage renal disease] in participants with DM [diabetes mellitus].

Indeed, the ALLHAT data showed . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

ALLHAT Findings Revisited in the Context of Subsequent Analyses, Other Trials, and Meta-analyses
Jackson T. Wright, Jr, Jeffrey L. Probstfield, William C. Cushman, Sara L. Pressel, Jeffrey A. Cutler, Barry R. Davis, Paula T. Einhorn, Mahboob Rahman, Paul K. Whelton, Charles E. Ford, L. Julian Haywood, Karen L. Margolis, Suzanne Oparil, Henry R. Black, Michael H. Alderman, and for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):832-842.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

ALLHAT Findings Revisited in the Context of Subsequent Analyses, Other Trials, and Meta-analyses—Reply
Jackson T. Wright, Jr, Jeffrey L. Probstfield, William C. Cushman, Sara Pressel, Jeffrey A. Cutler, Barry R. Davis, Paula T. Einhorn, Mahboob Rahman, Paul K. Whelton, Charles E. Ford, L. Julian Haywood, Karen L. Margolis, Suzanne Oparil, Henry R. Black, Michael H. Alderman, and for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1810-1811.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.