You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 19, October 26, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Pain
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
What Is Acupuncture After All?

Jéssica Maria Costi, MD; Shih Min Li, MD, MSc, PhD; Ari Ojeda Ocampo Moré, MD; João Eduardo Marten Teixeira, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The randomized trial by Cherkin et al1 comparing 2 forms of acupuncture, simulated acupuncture and usual care for low back pain, raises some questions we would like to address. The original Chinese term for acupuncture, Zhen Jiu, shows 2 ideograms: "needle" and "moxa." It means that from the beginning the acupuncture stimulation of points could be performed in different ways, not only by needle insertion. Even the specific Western literature supports this notion.2 Nowadays, much effort has been applied on using the precepts of evidence-based medicine, adapting from drug trials, in the acupuncture clinical trials. Nevertheless, the so-called sham procedures are controversial,3 and we believe they cannot be accepted as placebos.4

So what is being simulated indeed? The use of a toothpick to simulate insertion of a needle still . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Sham Acupuncture Is Not a Placebo
Shih Min Li, Jéssica Maria Costi, and João Eduardo Marten Teixeira
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(9):1011.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

A Randomized Trial Comparing Acupuncture, Simulated Acupuncture, and Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain
Daniel C. Cherkin, Karen J. Sherman, Andrew L. Avins, Janet H. Erro, Laura Ichikawa, William E. Barlow, Kristin Delaney, Rene Hawkes, Luisa Hamilton, Alice Pressman, Partap S. Khalsa, and Richard A. Deyo
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):858-866.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial With 3 Groups
Michael Haake, Hans-Helge Müller, Carmen Schade-Brittinger, Heinz D. Basler, Helmut Schäfer, Christoph Maier, Heinz G. Endres, Hans J. Trampisch, and Albrecht Molsberger
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1892-1898.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.